Click Here to Return Home

About AnsellCares
Source To Surgery
Source To Surgery
Request Form
Risk Management Programs
Health & Medical Resources
Career Opportunities
NEWS & INFORMATION
   Source To Surgery - June 1993, Vol. 1 Issue II

Occupationally Acquired HIV Infection
Gordon Gamsu, MD., FACR; Eric W. Olcott, MD.; and Susan D. Wall, M.D. Reprinted in Part with Permission from APPLIED RADIOLOGY, Volume 22, Number 1, Page 85

In the Canada, approximately 650,000 patients have developed the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) from infection with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). This figure reflects the cur- rent definition of AIDS, which uses severe Immunodeficiency (a low CD4 Iymphocyte count) and HIV positively as the criteria for diagnosis. One-quarter of the patients who have developed AIDS are dead. The remainder are hospitalized for an average of one month per year. It is estimated that 1,250,000 of the 253,000,000 people in the United States are infected with HIV and will develop AIDS. In urban hospitals with a substantial incidence of high risk patients, the proportion of HIV-infected patients can approach one in ten or even one in five. Potential sources of occupational HIV infection for hospital personnel include the following: known AIDS patients; known HIV-positive patients; HIV-positive patients unknown to be so; and HIV-infected patients who have not yet seroconverted. Although the risk of acquiring HIV infection in an occupational setting is low, progression to AIDS is considered inevitable. The interval from HIV infection to clinical AIDS is probably shorter for occupationally acquired infection than the present average of 10 years.

OCCUPATIONAL RISK

As of June 1990, 27 definite and 9 possible cases of occupational acquisition of HIV infection have been reported by the Centers for Disease Control, out of 5,425 cases of AIDS in healthcare workers. An additional 36 cases have been investigated but lack confirmation. Twenty-five of the 27 cases involved exposure to infected blood or blood-contaminated fluids. The remaining two cases were laboratory workers exposed to concentrated viral preparations. Twenty-two of the 27 occurred via puncture wounds with contaminated blood. The other five were by exposure of open wounds or mucous membranes. The additional nine cases of suspected occupational infection are unconfirmed because of the absence of a baseline HIV to document seroconversion.

The risk of infection from a single needle stick is estimated to be 0.3% to 0.4%. Several factors predispose to a higher likelihood of infection; namely, punctures with hollow needles, a large inoculum, and deep penetration. The risk of acquiring HIV infection following a needle stick, however, is considerably less than that for the hepatitis B virus, which is 10% to 30%.

Most documented cases of occupationally acquired infection are from patients known to have AIDS. The plasma concentration of HIV in patients with AIDS is 100 to 1,000 times greater than that of asymptomatic HIV positive individuals, and the risk is probably greater. The healthcare workers most likely to be infected are nurses, phlebotomists, and laboratory workers. This is in sharp contrast to occupational acquisition of hepatitis B infection, which occurs most frequently among surgeons, dentists, and personnel working in emergency rooms, labor and delivery rooms, and dialysis centers. The differences likely reflect the circumstances under which most AIDS patients receive therapy and hospitalization.

CONCLUSIONS

Patient-to-healthcare worker transmission of disease was much more prevalent in the era of widespread pulmonary tuberculosis than it is today. With the exception of hepatitis B, occupational exposure to infectious disease became uncommon after 1950, and this occurred only in a defined pool of healthcare workers. The public's fear of patients acquiring HIV infection from healthcare personnel has reached alarming proportions, although it is an extremely unlikely possibility. The negative impact on the healthcare industry could be substantial, if the incidence of occupational HIV infection were to increase. A potential backlash in treating HIV infected patients could ensue.

For the safety of the profession and the continued mutually beneficial relationship between healthcare workers and patients, every effort should be made to educate both the public and healthcare workers and to institute all available methods of decreasing potential HIV transmission in the medical environment.


Up
Previous Article
Up
Source to Surgery Index
Up
Table of Contents


BACK TO TOP
 
Home   |   About Ansell   |   Gloves   |   News & Information   |   What's New!   |   Privacy Notice

Copyright © 1996-2003 Ansell Healthcare Products Inc. • infolat@ansellhealthcare.com • All Rights Reserved.
Created By Malick Peterson Productions, Inc.