Click Here to Return Home

About AnsellCares
Source To Surgery
Source To Surgery
Request Form
Risk Management Programs
Health & Medical Resources
Career Opportunities
NEWS & INFORMATION
   Source To Surgery - February 1995, Vol. 3 Issue I

Diagnosis of Latex Allergy

Kevin J. Kelly, MD, Director of Pediatric Allergy/lmmunology
Medical College of Wisconsin and Children's Hospital of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, USA

Since the first report of contact urticaria to natural rubber products in 1979, a series of serious life-threatening allergic reactions has been reported worldwide.

Symptoms range from contact urticaria, upper and lower airway allergy, to life-threatening anaphylaxis. These patients are allergic to natural latex protein as a result of exposure in their job or through daily medical care.

Latex protein hypersensitivity has recently been implicated as a major public health problem facing the medical, surgical and medical manufacturing industry.

Risk Groups and Risk Factors

Specific groups have been identified to be at high risk of sensitization to latex protein. However, latex allergy is not restricted to patients from these high-risk groups. In a report of life-threatening anaphylactic reactions related to air contrast barium enemas, most of the patients experiencing reactions were not from high-risk groups. There is no accurate prediction of the proportion of the population that will become sensitized over time.

Health Care Professionals. From 2.9-16% of health care professionals have been sensitized to latex protein. Female personnel with intense exposure to latex (e.g., surgeons and theatre nurses) and atopic individuals are at highest risk. A contact or irritant dermatitis often precedes the development of immediate hypersensitivity in health care professionals and others who are sensitized via latex gloves.

Patients. In the USA, the sensitization rate for patients with spina bifida has ranged from 18-68%. The risk for atopic patients is approximately 3.8% while the general population seems to be sensitized at a rate of less than 1/1000.

If a medical history consistent with latex allergy is obtained (Table 1), elective surgery should be cancelled until confirmatory tests can be performed. It is prudent to assume that all patients with spina bifida are sensitized to latex. Therefore the usefulness of latex testing in this group is practically nonexistent.

Table 1
Manifestations of Allergy Associated with Latex Contact
  • Pnuritus
  • Erythema
  • Non-urticarial rash
  • Urticaria - local (hands) or generalized
  • Angioedema
  • Rhinoconjunctivitis
  • Dyspnea
  • Asthma/bronchospasm
  • Stridor
  • Hypotension
  • Anaphylaxis - intraoperative
  • Death

IgE-Mediated Hypersensitivity

Latex contains multiple proteins, lipids, and cis-1,4 polyisoprene, the major component for which it is harvested commercially to manufacture rubber products. As latex is a mixed component cytosol, many residual nonessential components are retained in the finished rubber product. In addition, over 100 different chemicals may be used in the latex manufacturing industry. However, neither the chemicals nor polyisoprene appear to be the offending antigens in latex immediate hypersensitivity. IgE-mediated hypersensitivity develops in response to water-soluble constituent proteins that remain in the latex following the manufacturing process.

Allergenic Proteins

Allergenic proteins reacting with IgE from sera of sensitized patients range in size from 14 kD to over 100 kD. With more than 200 proteins of 11 different molecular weight bands and several uncharacterized loF molecular weight peptides, definitive testing for latex allergy is inconsistent and difficult. Over 50 of these proteins have been shown tc have allergenic potential.

The route of sensitization (e.g., skin, mucosa, intravascular), the source protein (i.e., glove or other product), the latex type (e.g., low ammoniated, high ammoniated), and individual immune responses may result in variations in the severity of the reaction. For example, a health care professional may react to antigen from only one glove type and to different antigenic determinants than a patient with spina bifida.

Diagnosis

The diagnosis of protein hypersensitivity begins with a relevant history with heightened suspicion if a patient has experienced angioedema, pruritus, urticaria, rhinitis, conjunctivitis or asthma associated with condoms, balloons, rubber gloves or any object containing latex. If a positive history is obtained, diagnostic testing is the next step.

Latex sensitivity tests. Confirmation of latex sensitivity includes:

  • skin prick and patch testing for immediate wheal and flare response (skin prick is the most sensitive test)
  • serological tests for latex-specific IgE
  • basophilhistaminerelease
  • Iymphocyte proliferation
  • flow cytometry
  • immunoblot
  • provocation tests
  • Iatex glove "use" tests.
A patient should be considered sensitized to latex if the history and one confirmatory test are positive.

Care of the Latex-Sensitized Patient in the Operating Theatre

It is necessary to develop a protocol to maintain a latex-free surgical, inpatient and outpatient environment for the sensitized patient.

Aerosols. Latex protein may be present in the air of the operating theatre as an aerosol and, like pollen, may be inhaled as an aeroallergen. Starch donning powder on gloves adsorbs and binds protein readily and may have a role in making latex antigen airborne.

Low-Allergen Gloves

The use of latex examination and surgical gloves has increased dramatically since the introduction of universal precautions in hospital and clinic settings. This increased exposure may account for the emergence of latex allergy as the threshold for sensitization has been surpassed. The contribution of changes in the allergenicity and processing of latex to increased sensitization has not been established. Thus, use of a glove with a low allergen content may be desirable.

"Hypoallergenic" Gloves. In the USA, the FDA has recommended that the misleading term "hypoallergenic" be removed from gloves. This label was introduced for consumers who developed either an irritant or contact dermatitis from the accelerator or antioxidant chemicals used in the vulcanizing of rubber gloves. This is a distinct reaction and is not IgE-mediated. Some patients with immediate hypersensitivity may wrongly assume that these gloves are safe. One potential problem introduced by this response from the FDA is less quality control in glove manufacturing, because no substitute labeling has been proposed.

Synthetic gloves. Many companies have responded to the allergen problem by manufacturing synthetic, latex-free gloves (e.g., DermaPrene, Ansell International; Tactylon: Tactyle Technologies; Nealon: BD).

Treatment of Anaphylaxis

Treatment of anaphylaxis includes the use of adrenaline, oxygen and isotonic fluids. Since anaphylactic reactions may become biphasic, with recurrence within 8-12 hours, close observation is warranted after a reaction. Corticosteroids and H1 and H2 antagonists are indicated for use with inhaled B-adrenergic agent if the patient has bronchospasm. If a patient is on a B-blocking agent (e.g., propanolol), the response to standard doses of adrenaline may be incomplete. Higher doses of adrenaline and the use of glucagon may overcome this incomplete response. Confirmation of mast cell degranulation can be confirmed with a serum tryptase level, which will peak 1-2 hours after the anaphylactic reaction.

Further Reading

  • Eghrari-Sabet JS, Slater JE. Latex allergy: a potentially serious respiratory disorder. J. Respir Dis 1993; 143: 473-82.
  • Kelly KJ, Kurup VP, Zacharisen MC, Resnick A, Fink JN. Skin and serolosgic testing in the diagnosis of latex allergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1 992; 91: 1140-5.
  • Leynadier F. Pesquet C, Dry J. Anaphylaxis to latex during surgery. Anaesthesia 1989; 44: 547-50.
  • Own by D, Tomianovich M, Sammons N. McCullough J. Anaphylaxis associated with latex allergy during barium enema examinations. Am J Roent 1991; 156: 903-8
  • Slater J. Allergic reactions to natural rubber. Ann Allergy 1992; 68: 203-12.

    Up
    Previous Article
    Up
    Source to Surgery Index
    Up
    Table of Contents
    Next
    Next Article


  • BACK TO TOP
     
    Home   |   About Ansell   |   Gloves   |   News & Information   |   What's New!   |   Privacy Notice

    Copyright © 1996-2003 Ansell Healthcare Products Inc. • infolat@ansellhealthcare.com • All Rights Reserved.
    Created By Malick Peterson Productions, Inc.